Win a rent tribunal complaint over a move-out repainting bill with ChatGPT structuring the evidence
- Posted
- by Andreas Strandfelt (LinkedIn)
- Last checked
- Method:
- How we verify
Evidence: Described by posterThe person describes what happened in words, without screenshots or video.
Outcome
After moving out of a rental flat in Denmark after one year, Andreas Strandfelt was billed a surprisingly high amount for repainting, despite detailed move-in documentation, a thorough move-out inspection and evidence that an identical neighbouring flat had been painted more for less that month. The landlord wouldn't explain the costs. Strandfelt used ChatGPT to structure a complaint to the local rent tribunal, referencing the email thread, the move-in and move-out reports and the relevant legal paragraphs. The tribunal ruled in their favour, and the landlord had to return more of the deposit. The costs were 300 DKK to file and less than 200 DKK for a month of ChatGPT Plus.
Agent
Prompt Recreated prompt
The source didn't share its exact prompt, so we wrote this from what it describes.
Run this task now, exactly as written below. Everything you need is here, so start straight away and only stop if something required is missing or a rule below tells you to. Goal: Turn my evidence into a clear, well-organised complaint about my landlord's move-out charges for the official tenancy body. Fill in before running: - The charges I'm disputing and the amounts: [DETAILS] - My evidence (emails, move-in and move-out reports, photos): [PASTE / ATTACH] - Country and the body I'm complaining to: [DETAILS] You're not my lawyer. Stick to facts I give you, label any rule you mention as something to check against the official source, and keep the tone firm but polite. Rules: - Set out a short timeline, then each disputed charge with the evidence that answers it. - Refer to the rules I give you and mark any rule you add as one I must check against the official source. - Keep the tone factual and calm. - Finish with exactly what I'm asking the body to decide. - Check facts that can change (prices, opening hours, dates, availability, rules) against the official source, and tell me anything you couldn't verify. Output: A structured complaint with numbered references to each piece of evidence. You'll know it worked when: the tribunal rules in my favour and the deposit is returned.
Customize this prompt
Answer these questions and we'll put your answers into the prompt for you. You can leave any of them empty.
Your prompt
Run this task now, exactly as written below. Everything you need is here, so start straight away and only stop if something required is missing or a rule below tells you to. Goal: Turn my evidence into a clear, well-organised complaint about my landlord's move-out charges for the official tenancy body. Fill in before running: - The charges I'm disputing and the amounts: [DETAILS] - My evidence (emails, move-in and move-out reports, photos): [PASTE / ATTACH] - Country and the body I'm complaining to: [DETAILS] You're not my lawyer. Stick to facts I give you, label any rule you mention as something to check against the official source, and keep the tone firm but polite. Rules: - Set out a short timeline, then each disputed charge with the evidence that answers it. - Refer to the rules I give you and mark any rule you add as one I must check against the official source. - Keep the tone factual and calm. - Finish with exactly what I'm asking the body to decide. - Check facts that can change (prices, opening hours, dates, availability, rules) against the official source, and tell me anything you couldn't verify. Output: A structured complaint with numbered references to each piece of evidence. You'll know it worked when: the tribunal rules in my favour and the deposit is returned.
Scroll to see the whole prompt. Your answers show in green.
2 blanks are still empty: The charges I'm disputing and the amounts; Country and the body I'm complaining to. They'll stay in brackets in your prompt, so the chat tool may ask you about them.
What you type stays in this browser tab. We don't send it or save it, and it's gone when you leave the page. If you use a "Try this in" button, your answers go to that tool as part of the prompt.
Try this in:
This prompt has blanks to fill in, like [DETAILS]. We'll copy it instead of filling it in, so you can edit it before you send.
Opens in a new tab. We don't see what you send.
These links are only a shortcut. We're not affiliated with OpenAI, Google or xAI, and your results may not match the source.
Optional stronger version
Our rewrite with extra checks. The poster didn't test it.
Run this task now, exactly as written below. Everything you need is here, so start straight away and only stop if something required is missing or a rule below tells you to. Goal: Turn my evidence into a clear, well-organised complaint about my landlord's move-out charges for the official tenancy body. Fill in before running: - The charges I'm disputing and the amounts: [DETAILS] - My evidence (emails, move-in and move-out reports, photos): [PASTE / ATTACH] - Country and the body I'm complaining to: [DETAILS] You're not my lawyer. Stick to facts I give you, label any rule you mention as something to check against the official source, and keep the tone firm but polite. Rules: - Set out a short timeline, then each disputed charge with the evidence that answers it. - Refer to the rules I give you and mark any rule you add as one I must check against the official source. - Keep the tone factual and calm. - Finish with exactly what I'm asking the body to decide. - Check facts that can change (prices, opening hours, dates, availability, rules) against the official source, and tell me anything you couldn't verify. - Check the filing fee and deadline on the official site before I submit. Output: A structured complaint with numbered references to each piece of evidence. You'll know it worked when: the tribunal rules in my favour and the deposit is returned. Before you finish: re-read my goal and constraints, check your answer against each one, and list anything you assumed or couldn't confirm.
Source
Related cases
- Draft a security-deposit demand letter to a silent landlord with ChatGPTRecreated promptEvidence: Article or interview
The Economic Times reports that a tenant whose landlord stopped responding after move-out used GPT-4 to draft a formal letter demanding the return of a Rs 35,000 security deposit, after lawyers wouldn't take such a small case. The AI asked for names, address, amount, length of stay, rent and past contact attempts, and wrote a letter citing consumer laws and warning of legal action. The tenant says the landlord paid within a few days, and that they cross-checked the laws themselves after others warned about made-up legal references.
ChatGPT · Personal · Source date:
- Recover a RM 2,400 rental deposit in Kuala Lumpur using Malaysian tenancy rules found with ClaudeRecreated promptEvidence: Described by poster
Two months after moving out, with no deposit back, a tenant in Kuala Lumpur gave Claude his lease, messages, move-out photos and repair receipts. He says it pointed to a 30-day return obligation, drafted a factual demand email citing the lease clauses, helped him challenge deductions (RM 1,750 claimed for floor damage versus an RM 250-400 market rate) and drafted a housing-board complaint. He recovered the full RM 2,400 in about 2 hours of work over three weeks.
Claude · Personal · Source date:
- Win a small-claims case against a landlord over a deposit with ChatGPT's helpRecreated promptEvidence: Described by poster
A tenant says ChatGPT flagged that their landlord's security deposit exceeded legal limits under a 2019 law. When the landlord refused to return the money and filed a retaliatory $5,000 counterclaim, the tenant used ChatGPT to build the case, represented themselves in small claims court and says they won $1,180, with the counterclaim dismissed. The poster adds that AI tools are not substitutes for legal advice.
ChatGPT · Personal · Source date: